News General News Motorcycle Helmets Vs. Religious Rights

Connect with Us...

  • Facebook: allaboutbikesmag
  • FeedBurner: allaboutbikes/aIXA
  • Reddit: bikefan71
  • Twitter: allaboutbikes
  • YouTube: allaboutbikes

Motorcycle Helmets Vs. Religious Rights Hot

turban_or_helmetThere are plenty of arguments (although not good ones) to not wear a helmet. "Wearing a helmet cuts down my vision," or "I can't hear nearby cars when I'm wearing a helmet," or "If I wear a helmet, no one will be able to see my flowing locks." But a new argument has popped up in Ontario, Canada, as a group of Sikhs say that wearing a helmet impedes on their religious obligation to wear a turban.

The Ontario Highway Traffic Act currently requires all motorcyclists to wear a helmet, which for Sikhs, is impossible. The Record reports that Khalsa Sikh do not remove any hair from their bodies and are required to wear a dastaar, or turban.

A group of Sikhs in Canada have formed a petition and are asking for the helmet law to be amended.

"Asking someone to take off their turban is literally like asking them to take off their clothes. That's how it's viewed," said Baljit Singh Ghuman, chair of the Canadian Sikh Association. "It's part of the religion. It's part of the lifestyle."

A motorcycle helmet exemption for turban wearing Sikhs isn't unheard of. In both British Columbia and Manitoba, Sikhs are allowed to ride a motorcycle without a helmet. But a Ontario Superior Court Justice ruled in 2008 that mandatory helmets do not interfere with religious rights since a helmet "meaningfully" reduces the chance of injury. 

Ontario is gearing up for a new election season and the motorcycle helmet vs religious rights issue is becoming a hot topic.

"I personally wouldn't support a law that endangers any Ontarian," said Mark Cairns, NDP candidate for Kitchener-Conestoga. "I don't see how someone could get away with not wearing their seat belt in a car based on some matter of religious freedom."

What do you think? Should there be religious exemptions to motorcycle laws generally or in specific cases like this one? Let us know in the comments below and be sure to vote in our poll on this issue!

Powered by JReviews

Comments  

 
# Joel S L 2011-09-21 09:01
Let them wear turbans when they ride bikes. Then. when they crash, they'll die.

Remember, there are two types of bikers. Those that have crashed, and those that are going to.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Truck 2011-09-21 11:19
So don't ride a motorcycle. The only thing limiting these people's personal rights are their own beliefs.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Slatts 2011-09-21 17:34
The idea of Sikhs not wearing helmets is total nonsense. Go to this page:

http://www.sikh-history.com/sikhhist/personalities/military/sikhiniaf.html

There will see Air Chief Marshal Arjan Singh, a Sikh, the head of the Indian Air force up to 1969 and an ex fighter pilot who was quite happy to wear a crash helmet!
There you will find a photo of him in his Mystere IVA wearing a helmet. Don’t let anyone get away with telling you that Sikhs can’t wear helmets!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Paola 2011-09-25 19:30
In my opinion, helmets should be mandatory for everyone. Ontario can not change their rules because of a religion because later on many people that follow their religion's rules will be taking Canada. This means that these people will want to change many of Canadian rules because their religion does not let them do it. We should look for our safety.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# mcpartsguy 2011-09-26 08:57
I think the prophet would be ok if the Sikhs wear an item that will help save their lives. Of course Darwin did have a theory on people who do not take advantage of simple precautions. Buy a big helmet wear a thinner turban and make them work together
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# silvrfoxhuntr 2011-09-26 11:10
It is NOT a violation of human rights OR religious discrimination to require everyone to wear a helmet, where mandatory helmet laws exists. If the Sikh religion forbids them from removing their turbans, then it is their SIKH RELIGION that is interfering with their right to ride a motorcycle! It's as simple as that! You cannot change laws of personal safety to accommodate religious beliefs.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# slippery 2011-09-27 12:47
if they don't want to wear a helmet,than go back to your home country..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# kevin barrrett 2011-09-27 18:35
Here are my thoughts on this. Riding a motorcycle, like driving a car, is considered a 'privilege', not a 'right' and each rider/driver is bound by the laws of each state/province. The state/province may require certain conditions be met before allowing an individual to access this privilege and if one refuses to meet these conditions (ie, obey traffic rules, have a valid license, carry insurance, wear a helmet, etc) FOR WHATEVER REASON, then they have, for all intents and purposes, renounced their access to said privilege.
As far as I know, it isn't MANDATORY in any state or province that everyone must ride a motorcycle, and I'm not buying the "it's my right" argument put forth by groups like ABATE. I'll take the responses 'off-air'...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Johnny 2011-09-28 10:28
If you want to ride, obey the law!! If your faith demands that you not remove your mandated turban, then take a bus!!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Can TTfan 2011-10-30 18:40
Not too long ago young Sikh men were insisting that they be allowed to wear their daggers in school. The claim was that it is part of their religion's dress code - as is the requirement not to cut one's hair hence the need for the turban.

All I can say to that is that I would not feel comfortable sending my children off to a school where young men were running around with knives - so I am completely happy with an across the board ban on them for all students, with all being treated equally.

As far as the question of helmets goes, if a decision is being considered to allow Sikhs to wear them or not, then the law needs to be changed so that helmets are optional for all riders. Simply put, this is the only way such a situation can be handled with everyone being treated equally.

Frankly I don't care either way. The benefits of wearing a helmet when riding are so obvious to me that I would do so whatever the law - just as I always ride with full and appropriate gear.

Until the law is changed making helmets optional for all, Sikhs have a choice: either find some way of getting all the hair under a suitable helmet (clearly a marketing opportunity for someone), don't ride a bike, or move to somewhere where a helmet is not required.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Free Newsletter

Are You Getting Our Newsletter?

Sign Up Now! It's Free!

* Email
First Name
Last Name
 * = Required
 

Featured Articles

The 2012 Greystone Mansion Concours d’Elegance
Jan Plessner Named Editor Of LadyMoto
The Harley Lifestyle In Japan
The Last Ride - Motorcycle Hearses
The Ducati Dry Clutch and Its Distinctive Rattle

Popular Articles

BMW Sued for a Never-Ending Erection
The Harley Lifestyle In Japan
James Stewart Splits with Joe Gibbs Racing and Joins Yoshimura Suzuki
Myrtle Beach Bike Week 2012
The Last Ride - Motorcycle Hearses